Intracellular Pathogens
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose 50 (TCID50) Assay to Determine Infectivity of Cytopathic Viruses
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 8 |
| Book title |
Intracellular Pathogens
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3890-3_8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163889-7, 978-1-07-163890-3
|
| Authors |
Kaushal Baid, Kim R. Chiok, Arinjay Banerjee, Baid, Kaushal, Chiok, Kim R., Banerjee, Arinjay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2024.
All research outputs
#4,360,592
of 26,175,267 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,076
of 14,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,138
of 159,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,175,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.