You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
ECVAM and New Technologies for Toxicity Testing
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 10 |
| Book title |
New Technologies for Toxicity Testing
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4614-3055-1_10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4614-3054-4, 978-1-4614-3055-1
|
| Authors |
Michel Bouvier d’Yvoire, Susanne Bremer, Silvia Casati, Mara Ceridono, Sandra Coecke, Raffaella Corvi, Chantra Eskes, Laura Gribaldo, Claudius Griesinger, Holger Knaut, Jens P. Linge, Annett Roi, Valérie Zuang, Bouvier d’Yvoire, Michel, Bremer, Susanne, Casati, Silvia, Ceridono, Mara, Coecke, Sandra, Corvi, Raffaella, Eskes, Chantra, Gribaldo, Laura, Griesinger, Claudius, Knaut, Holger, Linge, Jens P., Roi, Annett, Zuang, Valérie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 20% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,518,189
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,231
of 4,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,372
of 422,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#121
of 500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.