↓ Skip to main content

Double-Stranded RNA

Overview of attention for book
Double-Stranded RNA
Springer US
Attention for Chapter: Co-immunoprecipitation-Based Isolation of Double-Stranded RNA-Associated Protein Complexes in Nicotiana benthamiana.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Co-immunoprecipitation-Based Isolation of Double-Stranded RNA-Associated Protein Complexes in Nicotiana benthamiana.
Book title
Double-Stranded RNA
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3702-9_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163701-2, 978-1-07-163702-9
Authors

Jia, Zhaoxing, Chen, Jianping, Yan, Fei, Wu, Guanwei

Abstract

Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is associated with most viral infections, and is generated in host cells during viral replication. Viral RNA replication occurs within the viral factories called the viral replication complexes (VRCs). In addition to viral genome, viral-derived dsRNA and replicase, the VRCs composition remains largely unexplored. The dsRNA binding domain of the B2 protein from Flock house virus has been reported to be used for detecting viral-derived long dsRNA in plants efficiently. Nicotiana benthamiana is widely used as a model plant for plant-microbe interactions owing to its susceptibility to diverse plant diseases, especially viral diseases. Here, we describe the use of Nicotiana benthamiana stably expressing GFP-tagged dsRNA binding protein (B2: GFP) to pull down dsRNA and associated host and viral proteins from turnip mosaic virus-infected plants. The obtained protein complexes are compatible with functional assays, Western blotting, and mass spectrometry. This system provides a valuable and robust tool to study VRC proteome in N. benthamiana upon plant viral infections.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,190,674
of 25,252,667 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,967
of 14,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,565
of 253,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#101
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,252,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.