Borrelia burgdorferi
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Direct Detection of Borrelia Species in Tissues
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Borrelia burgdorferi
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3561-2_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163560-5, 978-1-07-163561-2
|
| Authors |
Gadila, Shiva Kumar Goud, Embers, Monica E. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,504,285
of 25,358,192 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,380
of 14,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,755
of 299,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#47
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,358,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.