↓ Skip to main content

Epithelial Cell Culture

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Equine Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture.
Book title
Epithelial Cell Culture
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3609-1_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163608-4, 978-1-07-163609-1
Authors

Falk, Julia, Donadeu, F Xavier, Donadeu, F. Xavier

Abstract

Groundbreaking work by Takahashi and Yamanaka in 2006 demonstrated that non-embryonic cells can be reprogrammed into pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) by forcing the expression of a defined set of transcription factors in culture, thus overcoming ethical concerns linked to embryonic stem cells. Induced PSCs have since revolutionized biomedical research, holding tremendous potential also in other areas such as livestock production and wildlife conservation. iPSCs exhibit broad accessibility, having been derived from a multitude of cell types and species. Apart from humans, iPSCs hold particular medical promise in the horse. The potential of iPSCs has been shown in a variety of biomedical contexts in the horse. However, progress in generating therapeutically useful equine iPSCs has lagged behind that reported in humans, with the generation of footprint-free iPSCs using non-integrative reprogramming approaches having proven particularly challenging. A greater understanding of the underlying molecular pathways and essential factors required for the generation and maintenance of equine iPSCs and their differentiation into relevant lineages will be critical for realizing their significant potential in veterinary regenerative medicine. This article outlines up-to-date protocols for the successful culture of equine iPSC, including colony selection, expansion, and adaptation to feeder-free conditions.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#20,375,439
of 25,045,181 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,845
of 14,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,270
of 137,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#160
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,045,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,092 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.