↓ Skip to main content

Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Reverse Genetics Approaches for SARS-CoV-2.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Reverse Genetics Approaches for SARS-CoV-2.
Book title
Reverse Genetics of RNA Viruses
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3533-9_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163532-2, 978-1-07-163533-9
Authors

Chiem, Kevin, Nogales, Aitor, Almazán, Fernando, Ye, Chengjin, Martínez-Sobrido, Luis

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new member of the Coronaviridae family responsible for the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. To date, SARS-CoV-2 has been accountable for over 624 million infection cases and more than 6.5 million human deaths. The development and implementation of SARS-CoV-2 reverse genetics approaches have allowed researchers to genetically engineer infectious recombinant (r)SARS-CoV-2 to answer important questions in the biology of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Reverse genetics techniques have also facilitated the generation of rSARS-CoV-2 expressing reporter genes to expedite the identification of compounds with antiviral activity in vivo and in vitro. Likewise, reverse genetics has been used to generate attenuated forms of the virus for their potential implementation as live-attenuated vaccines (LAV) for the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Here we describe the experimental procedures for the generation of rSARS-CoV-2 using a well-established and robust bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based reverse genetics system. The protocol allows to produce wild-type and mutant rSARS-CoV-2 that can be used to understand the contribution of viral proteins and/or amino acid residues in viral replication and transcription, pathogenesis and transmission, and interaction with cellular host factors.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2023.
All research outputs
#16,983,610
of 24,965,047 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,858
of 14,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,378
of 85,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#48
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,965,047 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.