You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Data Mining in Clinical Medicine
|
---|---|
Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1985-7 |
ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1984-0, 978-1-4939-1985-7, 978-1-4939-5474-2
|
Authors |
Fernandez-Llatas, Carlos, García-Gómez, Juan Miguel |
Editors |
Carlos Fernández-Llatas, Juan Miguel García-Gómez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 40% |
Argentina | 1 | 7% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Egypt | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 21% |
Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 25 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
Engineering | 10 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,200,950
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#1,025
of 14,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,525
of 359,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#62
of 998 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 998 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.