A described simple and advanced protocol for Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Method as applied to transmembrane (TM) orientation (SCAM™) permits a topology analysis of proteins in their native state and can be universally adapted to any membrane system to either systematically map an uniform or identify and quantify the degree of mixed topology or establish transmembrane assembly dynamics from relatively static experimental data such as endpoint topologies of membrane proteins. In this approach, noncritical individual amino acids that are thought to reside in the putative extracellular or intracellular loops of a membrane protein are replaced one at the time by cysteine residue, and the orientation with respect to the membrane is evaluated by using a pair of membrane-impermeable non-detectable and detectable thiol-reactive labeling reagents. For the most water-exposed cysteine residues in proteins, the thiol pKa lies in the range of 8-9, and formation of cysteinyl thiolate ions is optimum in aqueous rather in a nonpolar environment. These features and the ease of specific chemical modification with thiol reagents are central to SCAM™. Membrane side-specific sulfhydryl labeling allows to discriminate "exposed, protected or dynamic" cysteines strategically "implanted" at desired positions throughout cysteine less target protein template. The strategy described is widely used to map the topology of membrane protein and establish its transmembrane dynamics in intact cells of both diderm (two-membraned) Gram-negative and monoderm (one-membraned) Gram-positive bacteria, cell-derived oriented membrane vesicles, and proteoliposomes.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#16,839,545
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,797
of 13,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,977
of 15,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
