↓ Skip to main content

Mathematical Knowledge Management

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Mathematical Knowledge Management'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Digitisation, Representation, and Formalisation Digital Libraries of Mathematics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 MKM from Book to Computer: A Case Study
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 From Proof-Assistants to Distributed Libraries of Mathematics: Tips and Pitfalls
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Managing Digital Mathematical Discourse
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 NAG Library Documentation
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 On the Roles of LATEX and MathML in Encoding and Processing Mathematical Expressions
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Problems and Solutions for Markup for Mathematical Examples and Exercises
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 An Annotated Corpus and a Grammar Model of Theorem Description
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 A Query Language for a Metadata Framework about Mathematical Resources
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Information Retrieval in MML
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 An Expert System for the Flexible Processing of X ML -Based Mathematical Knowledge in a P ROLOG —Environment
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Towards Collaborative Content Management and Version Control for Structured Mathematical Knowledge
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 On the Integrity of a Repository of Formalized Mathematics
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 A Theoretical Analysis of Hierarchical Proofs
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Comparing Mathematical Provers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Translating Mizar for First Order Theorem Provers
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Mathematical Semantic Web
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

2 X users


10 Dimensions

Readers on

1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Mathematical Knowledge Management
Published by
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/3-540-36469-2
978-3-54-000568-1, 978-3-54-036469-6

Asperti, Andrea, Buchberger, Bruno, Davenport, James Harold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
of 8,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 128,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.