↓ Skip to main content

Microbial Natural Products Chemistry

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Metabolomics Applied to Cyanobacterial Toxins and Natural Products.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metabolomics Applied to Cyanobacterial Toxins and Natural Products.
Chapter number 2
Book title
Microbial Natural Products Chemistry
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, October 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-41741-2_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-141740-5, 978-3-03-141741-2
Authors

Weiss, Márcio Barczyszyn, Médice, Rhuana Valdetário, Jacinavicius, Fernanda Rios, Pinto, Ernani, Crnkovic, Camila Manoel

Abstract

The biological and chemical diversity of Cyanobacteria is remarkable. These ancient prokaryotes are widespread in nature and can be found in virtually every habitat on Earth where there is light and water. They are producers of an array of secondary metabolites with important ecological roles, toxic effects, and biotechnological applications. The investigation of cyanobacterial metabolites has benefited from advances in analytical tools and bioinformatics that are employed in metabolomic analyses. In this chapter, we review selected articles highlighting the use of targeted and untargeted metabolomics in the analyses of secondary metabolites produced by cyanobacteria. Here, cyanobacterial secondary metabolites have been didactically divided into toxins and natural products according to their relevance to toxicological studies and drug discovery, respectively. This review illustrates how metabolomics has improved the chemical analysis of cyanobacteria in terms of speed, sensitivity, selectivity, and/or coverage, allowing for broader and more complex scientific questions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Librarian 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Social Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,190,707
of 24,627,841 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,428
of 5,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,124
of 150,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,627,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them