You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Data standards for Omics data: the basis of data sharing and reuse.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 2 |
| Book title |
Bioinformatics for Omics Data
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-027-0_2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-026-3, 978-1-61779-027-0
|
| Authors |
Stephen A. Chervitz, Eric W. Deutsch, Dawn Field, Helen Parkinson, John Quackenbush, Phillipe Rocca-Serra, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., Chris F. Taylor, Ronald Taylor, Catherine A. Ball, Christian J. Stoeckert, Christian J. Stoeckert, Jr., Chervitz, Stephen A., Deutsch, Eric W., Field, Dawn, Parkinson, Helen, Quackenbush, John, Rocca-Serra, Phillipe, Sansone, Susanna-Assunta, Stoeckert, Christian J., Taylor, Chris F., Taylor, Ronald, Ball, Catherine A. |
| Editors |
Bernd Mayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 27% |
| Computer Science | 18 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 14% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2020.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,148
of 14,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,257
of 198,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#185
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.