You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Integrating Omics data for signaling pathways, interactome reconstruction, and functional analysis.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 19 |
| Book title |
Bioinformatics for Omics Data
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-61779-027-0_19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-61779-026-3, 978-1-61779-027-0
|
| Authors |
Tieri P, de la Fuente A, Termanini A, Franceschi C, Paolo Tieri, Alberto de la Fuente, Alberto Termanini, Claudio Franceschi, Tieri, Paolo, de la Fuente, Alberto, Termanini, Alberto, Franceschi, Claudio |
| Editors |
Bernd Mayer |
| Abstract |
Omics data and computational approaches are today providing a key to disentangle the complex architecture of living systems. The integration and analysis of data of different nature allows to extract meaningful representations of signaling pathways and protein interactions networks, helpful in achieving an increased understanding of such intricate biochemical processes. We here describe a general workflow and relative hurdles in integrating online Omics data and analyzing reconstructed representations by using the available computational platforms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 23% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 65% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,161,097
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#731
of 13,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,223
of 183,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#17
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,020 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.