Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2023
Springer Nature Switzerland
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP 2023
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-031-43153-1 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-03-143152-4, 978-3-03-143153-1
|
| Editors |
Gian Luca Foresti, Andrea Fusiello, Edwin Hancock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 15 | 54% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 64% |
| Scientists | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,555,388
of 24,512,028 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#237
of 8,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,221
of 455,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,512,028 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.