Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease
Humana Press
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Immuno-based Detection Assays to Quantify Distinct Mutant Huntingtin Conformations in Biological Samples.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-62703-438-8_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-62703-437-1, 978-1-62703-438-8
|
| Authors |
Lotz, Gregor P, Weiss, Andreas, Gregor P. Lotz, Andreas Weiss |
| Abstract |
A pathological hallmark of many protein-misfolding diseases is the formation of insoluble aggregates. Quantitative methods are needed to better resolve and define the formation, aggregation, and temporal dynamics of soluble misfolded proteins in native settings. In this book chapter we describe simple and sensitive detection methods to characterize high ordered aggregates (AGERA) and subsets of distinct soluble aggregates (SEC-FRET) of mutant huntingtin protein in biological samples. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 27% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 18% |
| Researcher | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 55% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,851
of 13,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,027
of 280,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#220
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,079 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.