↓ Skip to main content

Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Longitudinal Imaging and Analysis of Neurons Expressing Polyglutamine-Expanded Proteins
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Atomic Force Microscopy Assays for Evaluating Polyglutamine Aggregation in Solution and on Surfaces
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Morphometric Analysis of Huntington's Disease Neurodegeneration in Drosophila.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Size analysis of polyglutamine protein aggregates using fluorescence detection in an analytical ultracentrifuge.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 A Method for the Incremental Expansion of Polyglutamine Repeats in Recombinant Proteins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Characterizing social behavior in genetically targeted mouse models of brain disorders.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 PCR Amplification and Sequence Analysis of GC-Rich Sequences: Aristaless-Related Homeobox Example
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Challenges of “Sticky” Co-immunoprecipitation: Polyalanine Tract Protein–Protein Interactions
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Molecular Pathology of Polyalanine Expansion Disorders: New Perspectives from Mouse Models
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Yeast as a platform to explore polyglutamine toxicity and aggregation.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Immuno-based Detection Assays to Quantify Distinct Mutant Huntingtin Conformations in Biological Samples.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Modeling and Analysis of Repeat RNA Toxicity in Drosophila
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Analyzing Modifiers of Protein Aggregation in C. elegans by Native Agarose Gel Electrophoresis.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Kinetic Analysis of Aggregation Data
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Detecting Soluble PolyQ Oligomers and Investigating Their Impact on Living Cells Using Split-GFP
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Cell Biological Approaches to Investigate Polyglutamine-Expanded AR Metabolism
Attention for Chapter 14: Analyzing Modifiers of Protein Aggregation in C. elegans by Native Agarose Gel Electrophoresis.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Analyzing Modifiers of Protein Aggregation in C. elegans by Native Agarose Gel Electrophoresis.
Chapter number 14
Book title
Tandem Repeats in Genes, Proteins, and Disease
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-438-8_14
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-437-1, 978-1-62703-438-8
Authors

Holmberg, Mats, Nollen, Ellen A A, Mats Holmberg, Ellen A. A. Nollen

Abstract

The accumulation of specific aggregation-prone proteins during aging is thought to be involved in several diseases, most notably Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease as well as polyglutamine expansion disorders such as Huntington's disease. Caenorhabditis elegans disease models with transgenic expression of fluorescently tagged aggregation-prone proteins have been used to screen for genetic modifiers of aggregation. To establish the role of modifying factors in the generation of aggregation intermediates, a method has been developed using native agarose gel electrophoresis (NAGE) that enables parallel screening of aggregation patterns of fluorescently labeled aggregation-prone proteins. Together with microscopy-based genetic screens this method can be used to identify modifiers of protein aggregation and characterize their molecular function. Although described here for analyzing aggregates in C. elegans, NAGE can be adjusted for use in other model organisms as well as for cultured cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,710,927
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#10,098
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,749
of 283,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#300
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.