↓ Skip to main content

Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Chemical hazards in the organisation.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Toxicology of water.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Perfluorinated compounds.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Toxicologically relevant phthalates in food.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: bulky DNA adducts and cellular responses.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Heavy Metals Toxicity and the Environment
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Toxicology of ambient particulate matter.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Nanomaterials: a challenge for toxicological risk assessment?
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Immunotoxicology and its application in risk assessment.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Chemical sensitization and allergotoxicology.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Male reprotoxicity and endocrine disruption.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Recent trends in statistical QSAR modeling of environmental chemical toxicity.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Chirality and its role in environmental toxicology.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Genetic Variability in Molecular Responses to Chemical Exposure
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 A personalized life: biomarker monitoring from cradle to grave.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 On the role of low-dose effects and epigenetics in toxicology.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Hormesis: improving predictions in the low-dose zone.
Attention for Chapter 8: Nanomaterials: a challenge for toxicological risk assessment?
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Nanomaterials: a challenge for toxicological risk assessment?
Chapter number 8
Book title
Molecular, Clinical and Environmental Toxicology
Published in
EXS, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-3-7643-8340-4_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-76-438339-8, 978-3-76-438340-4
Authors

Andrea Haase, Jutta Tentschert, Andreas Luch

Editors

Andreas Luch

Abstract

Nanotechnology has emerged as one of the central technologies in the twenty-first century. This judgment becomes apparent by considering the increasing numbers of people employed in this area; the numbers of patents, of scientific publications, of products on the market; and the amounts of money invested in R&D. Prospects originating from different fields of nanoapplication seem unlimited. However, nanotechnology certainly will not be able to meet all of the ambitious expectations communicated, yet has high potential to heavily affect our daily life in the years to come. This might occur in particular in the field of consumer products, for example, by introducing nanomaterials in cosmetics, textiles, or food contact materials. Another promising area is the application of nanotechnology in medicine fueling hopes to significantly improve diagnosis and treatment of all kinds of diseases. In addition, novel technologies applying nanomaterials are expected to be instrumental in waste remediation and in the production of efficient energy storage devices and thus may help to overcome world's energy problems or to revolutionize computer and data storage technologies. In this chapter, we will focus on nanomaterials. After a brief historic and general overview, current proposals of how to define nanomaterials will be summarized. Due to general limitations, there is still no single, internationally accepted definition of the term "nanomaterial." After elaborating on the status quo and the scope of nanoanalytics and its shortcomings, the current thinking about possible hazards resulting from nanoparticulate exposures, there will be an emphasis on the requirements to be fulfilled for appropriate health risk assessment and regulation of nanomaterials. With regard to reliable risk assessments, until now there is still the remaining issue to be resolved of whether or not specific challenges and unique features exist on the nanoscale that have to be tackled and distinctively addressed, given that they substantially differ from those encountered with microsized materials or regular chemicals. Based on the current knowledge, we finally provide a proposal on how risk assessment in the nanofield could be achieved and how it might look like in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 21%
Student > Bachelor 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 21%
Materials Science 2 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 5 36%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,251,053
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from EXS
#59
of 93 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,193
of 163,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EXS
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.