You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Immunofluorescent Antibody Techniques in the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Humans
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
SARS-CoV-2
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2111-0_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162110-3, 978-1-07-162111-0
|
| Authors |
Hueston, Linda |
| Abstract |
Immunofluorescence (IF) is an important technique used in the diagnosis of many infectious diseases. In virology, it has proven to be particularly suited to detecting antibody directed against newly emerging viruses able to be cultivated in cell culture. It permits visualization of antibody and allows for antibody class to be determined which is critical to understanding the timing of infection. The procedure used to determine IgG, IgA, and IgM antibody directed against SARS-CoV-2 in humans is described in this chapter. These methods were developed for routine diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Australia at the start of the global pandemic in 2020. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#18,146,485
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,400
of 13,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,914
of 507,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#291
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,318 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.