You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Pharmacogenomic Screening of Drug Candidates using Patient-Specific hiPSC-Derived Cardiomyocyte High-Throughput Calcium Imaging
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 10 |
Book title |
Pharmacogenomics in Drug Discovery and Development
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2573-6_10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162572-9, 978-1-07-162573-6
|
Authors |
Blancard, Malorie, Fetterman, K. Ashley, Burridge, Paul W., Malorie Blancard, K. Ashley Fetterman, Paul W. Burridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,236,451
of 23,419,482 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,851
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,777
of 434,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#63
of 304 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,419,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 304 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.