↓ Skip to main content

Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 609: The Ability of a Concentrated Surfactant Gel to Reduce an Aerobic, Anaerobic and Multispecies Bacterial Biofilm In Vitro.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Ability of a Concentrated Surfactant Gel to Reduce an Aerobic, Anaerobic and Multispecies Bacterial Biofilm In Vitro.
Chapter number 609
Book title
Advances in Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Public Health
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2021
DOI 10.1007/5584_2020_609
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-071201-3, 978-3-03-071202-0
Authors

Salisbury, Anne-Marie, Mullin, Marc, Foulkes, Lauren, Chen, Rui, Percival, Steven L, Percival, Steven L.

Abstract

Biofilm formation in wounds can lead to increased inflammation, infection and delayed wound healing. Additionally, biofilms show increased recalcitrance to antimicrobials compared to their planktonic counterparts making them difficult to manage and treat. Biofilms are frequently polymicrobial, consisting of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, as well as fungi and yeasts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a concentrated surfactant gel with antibacterial preservative agents (CSG) against wound relevant opportunistic pathogens, including an aerobic biofilm, anaerobic biofilm and multispecies biofilm. The CSG was added to a 48 h anaerobic biofilm of Bacteroides fragilis, a 24 h multispecies biofilm of Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis and a 24 h biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in an in vitro wound relevant environment. Following a contact time of 24 h with the CSG, the bacterial cell density of the biofilms was reduced by 2-4 log in comparison to an untreated control. The results demonstrate the ability of the CSG to disrupt wound relevant biofilms and support the use of the CSG in the clinic to treat wounds caused by biofilm related infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,134,382
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,301
of 4,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,090
of 505,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#41
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.