↓ Skip to main content

Axon Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (TRAP) and Bioinformatic RNA-Seq Analysis in Post-metamorphic Xenopus laevis.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Translating Ribosome Affinity Purification (TRAP) and Bioinformatic RNA-Seq Analysis in Post-metamorphic Xenopus laevis.
Chapter number 16
Book title
Axon Regeneration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3012-9_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163011-2, 978-1-07-163012-9
Authors

Whitworth, Gregg B, Watson, Fiona L, Whitworth, Gregg B., Watson, Fiona L., Gregg B. Whitworth, Fiona L. Watson

Abstract

Recent technical advances provide the ability to isolate and purify mRNAs from genetically distinct cell types so as to provide a broader view of gene expression as they relate to gene networks. These tools allow the genome of organisms undergoing different developmental or diseased states and environmental or behavioral conditions to be compared. Translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP), a method using transgenic animals expressing a ribosomal affinity tag (ribotag) that targets ribosome-bound mRNAs, allows for the rapid isolation of genetically distinct populations of cells. In this chapter, we provide stepwise methods for carrying out an updated protocol for using the TRAP method in the South African clawed frog Xenopus laevis. A discussion of the experimental design and necessary controls and their rationale, along with a description of the bioinformatic steps involved in analyzing the Xenopus laevis translatome using TRAP and RNA-Seq, is also provided.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2023.
All research outputs
#13,901,293
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,549
of 13,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,292
of 446,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#82
of 650 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 650 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.