↓ Skip to main content

Axon Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Transneuronal Delivery of Cytokines to Stimulate Mammalian Spinal Cord Regeneration.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Transneuronal Delivery of Cytokines to Stimulate Mammalian Spinal Cord Regeneration.
Book title
Axon Regeneration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3012-9_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163011-2, 978-1-07-163012-9
Authors

Terheyden-Keighley, Daniel, Leibinger, Marco, Zeitler, Charlotte, Fischer, Dietmar

Abstract

The spinal cord contains multiple fiber tracts necessary for locomotion. However, as a part of the central nervous system, they are extremely limited in regenerating after injury. Many of these key fiber tracts originate from deep brain stem nuclei that are difficult to access. Here we detail a new methodology that achieves functional regeneration in mice after a complete spinal cord crush, describing the crushing procedure itself, intracortical treatment application, and a set of appropriate validation steps. The regeneration is achieved by the one-time transduction of neurons in the motor cortex with a viral vector expressing the designer cytokine hIL-6. This potent stimulator of the JAK/STAT3 pathway and regeneration is transported in axons and then transneuronally delivered to critical deep brain stem nuclei via collateral axon terminals, resulting in previously paralyzed mice walking again after 3-6 weeks. With no previously known strategy accomplishing this degree of recovery, this model is well suited to studying the functional impact of compounds/treatments currently only known to promote anatomical regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2023.
All research outputs
#13,180,325
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,348
of 13,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,201
of 439,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#60
of 510 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,339 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 510 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.