↓ Skip to main content

Axon Regeneration

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 18: Profiling Dynamic Changes in DNA Accessibility During Axon Regeneration After Optic Nerve Crush in Adult Zebrafish.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Profiling Dynamic Changes in DNA Accessibility During Axon Regeneration After Optic Nerve Crush in Adult Zebrafish.
Chapter number 18
Book title
Axon Regeneration
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-3012-9_18
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-163011-2, 978-1-07-163012-9
Authors

Dhara, Sumona P, Udvadia, Ava J, Dhara, Sumona P., Udvadia, Ava J.

Abstract

A time-course series utilizing assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) can be used to detect changes in accessibility of DNA regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers over the course of regeneration. This chapter describes methods for preparing ATAC-seq libraries from isolated zebrafish retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) following optic nerve crush at selected post-injury time points. These methods have been used for identifying dynamic changes in DNA accessibility that govern successful optic nerve regeneration in zebrafish. This method may be adapted to identify changes in DNA accessibility that accompany other types of insults to RGCs or to identify changes that occur over the course of development.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Neuroscience 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,795,718
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,352
of 14,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,458
of 476,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#228
of 715 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,219 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 715 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.