You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Biochemical and Microscopic Analyses for Sphingolipids and Its Related Molecules in Phagosomes
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 16 |
Book title |
Methods in Molecular Biology
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-2910-9_16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-162909-3, 978-1-07-162910-9
|
Authors |
Nakayama, Hitoshi, Hanafusa, Kei, Iwabuchi, Kazuhisa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#16,233,040
of 23,989,683 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,603
of 13,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,330
of 439,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#242
of 617 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,989,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 617 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.