↓ Skip to main content

Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Human Disease

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Human Disease'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 371 Cancer Stem Cell Initiation by Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 374 Genome Editing Using Cas9-gRNA Ribonucleoprotein in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells for Disease Modeling
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 375 Efficient Generation of Functional Hepatocytes from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Disease Modeling and Disease Gene Discovery
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 376 Methods to Induce Small-Scale Differentiation of iPS Cells into Dopaminergic Neurons and to Detect Disease Phenotypes
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 377 A High-Efficiency Method for the Production of Endothelial Cells from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 378 Generation and Encapsulation of Human iPSC-Derived Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells for Proangiogenic Therapy
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 379 Monitoring Axonal Degeneration in Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Models of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegias
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 383 Differentiating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Toward Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 384 Creating Cell Model 2.0 Using Patient Samples Carrying a Pathogenic Mitochondrial DNA Mutation: iPSC Approach for LHON.
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 385 Derivation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell (iPSC) Lines from Patient-Specific Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) Using Episomal Vectors
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 399 Generation of Cortical, Dopaminergic, Motor, and Sensory Neurons from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 407 Amyloid β (Aβ) ELISA of Human iPSC-Derived Neuronal Cultures
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 409 Genome Editing of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes to Model Genetic Ocular Diseases.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 418 A Protocol for Stepwise Differentiation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells into Retinal Pigment Epithelium.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 419 Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Renal Epithelial Cells
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 420 Autophagy Dysfunction as a Phenotypic Readout in hiPSC-Derived Neuronal Cell Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 421 Image-Based Quantitation of Kainic Acid-Induced Excitotoxicity as a Model of Neurodegeneration in Human iPSC-Derived Neurons.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 422 CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Knock-in of Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors into the AAVS1 Locus of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 427 Generation of Cardiomyocytes and Endothelial Cells from Human iPSCs by Chemical Modulation of Wnt Signaling
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 451 Analysis of Mitochondrial Dysfunction by Microplate Reader in hiPSC-Derived Neuronal Cell Models of Neurodegenerative Disorders
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 452 Generation and Hematopoietic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cell-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines for Disease Modeling of Hematopoietic and Immunological Diseases
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 454 Modeling Early Neural Crest Development via Induction from hiPSC-Derived Neural Plate Border-like Cells
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 456 Immunoassay for Quantitative Detection of Antibody Transcytosis Across the Blood-Brain Barrier In Vitro
Attention for Chapter 422: CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Knock-in of Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors into the AAVS1 Locus of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Knock-in of Genetically Encoded Fluorescent Biosensors into the AAVS1 Locus of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.
Chapter number 422
Book title
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells and Human Disease
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2021
DOI 10.1007/7651_2021_422
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162584-2, 978-1-07-162585-9
Authors

Stellon, David, Tran, Minh Thuan Nguyen, Talbot, Jana, Chear, Sueanne, Khalid, Mohd Khairul Nizam Mohd, Pébay, Alice, Vickers, James C, King, Anna E, Hewitt, Alex W, Cook, Anthony L, Vickers, James C., King, Anna E., Hewitt, Alex W., Cook, Anthony L.

Abstract

Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors (GEFBs) enable researchers to visualize and quantify cellular processes in live cells. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be genetically engineered to express GEFBs via integration into the Adeno-Associated Virus Integration Site 1 (AAVS1) safe harbor locus. This can be achieved using CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoprotein targeting to cause a double-strand break at the AAVS1 locus, which subsequently undergoes homology-directed repair (HDR) in the presence of a donor plasmid containing the GEFB sequence. We describe an optimized protocol for CRISPR/Cas-mediated knock-in of GEFBs into the AAVS1 locus of human iPSCs that allows puromycin selection and which exhibits negligible off-target editing. The resulting iPSC lines can be differentiated into cells of different lineages while retaining expression of the GEFB, enabling live-cell interrogation of cell pathway activities across a diversity of disease models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2021.
All research outputs
#15,155,790
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,838
of 13,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,439
of 429,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#75
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,324 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.