↓ Skip to main content

Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 253

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 36: Feeding Behavioural Studies with Freshwater Gammarus spp.: The Importance of a Standardised Methodology.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Feeding Behavioural Studies with Freshwater Gammarus spp.: The Importance of a Standardised Methodology.
Chapter number 36
Book title
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Volume 253
Published in
Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/398_2019_36
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-052540-8, 978-3-03-052541-5
Authors

Giulia Consolandi, Alex T. Ford, Michelle C. Bloor, Consolandi, Giulia, Ford, Alex T., Bloor, Michelle C.

Abstract

Freshwater Gammarids are common leaf-shredding detritivores, and they usually feed on naturally conditioned organic material, in other words leaf litter that is characterised by an increased palatability, due to the action and presence of microorganisms (Chaumot et al. 2015; Cummins 1974: Maltby et al. 2002). Gammarus spp. are biologically omnivorous organisms, so they are involved in shredding leaf litter and are also prone to cannibalism, predation behaviour (Kelly et al. 2002) and coprophagy when juveniles (McCahon and Pascoe 1988). Gammarus spp. is a keystone species (Woodward et al. 2008), and it plays an important role in the decomposition of organic matter (Alonso et al. 2009; Bundschuh et al. 2013) and is also a noteworthy prey for fish and birds (Andrén and Eriksson Wiklund 2013; Blarer and Burkhardt-Holm 2016). Gammarids are considered to be fairly sensitive to different contaminants (Ashauer et al. 2010; Bloor et al. 2005; Felten et al. 2008a; Lahive et al. 2015; Kunz et al. 2010); in fact Amphipods have been reported to be one of the most sensitive orders to metals and organic compounds (Wogram and Liess 2001), which makes them representative test organisms for ecotoxicological studies and valid sentinel species for assessing water quality status (Garcia-Galan et al. 2017).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Chemistry 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2019.
All research outputs
#13,431,444
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#101
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,658
of 444,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them