↓ Skip to main content

Computer-Aided Antibody Design

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computer-Aided Antibody Design'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Antibody Sequence and Structure Analyses Using IMGT ® : 30 Years of Immunoinformatics
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Structural Classification of CDR-H3 in Single-Domain V H H Antibodies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Computational Modeling of Antibody and T-Cell Receptor (CDR3 Loops)
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Molecular Dynamics Simulation for Investigating Antigen–Antibody Interaction
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Molecular Dynamics Methods for Antibody Design
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Probing Conformational Dynamics of Antibodies with Geometric Simulations
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 PITHA: A Webtool to Predict Immunogenicity for Humanized and Fully Human Therapeutic Antibodies
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Thermal Stability Estimation of Single Domain Antibodies Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Assessing and Engineering Antibody Stability Using Experimental and Computational Methods
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 In Silico Prediction Method for Protein Asparagine Deamidation
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Structure-Based Optimization of Antibody-Based Biotherapeutics for Improved Developability: A Practical Guide for Molecular Modelers
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 B-Cell Epitope Predictions Using Computational Methods
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Computational Epitope Prediction and Design for Antibody Development and Detection
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Information-Driven Antibody–Antigen Modelling with HADDOCK
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Structural Modeling of Adaptive Immune Responses to Infection
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Protein–Protein Interaction Modelling with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Structural Considerations in Affinity Maturation of Antibody-Based Biotherapeutic Candidates
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Structure-Based Affinity Maturation of Antibody Based on Double-Point Mutations
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Antibody Affinity Maturation Using Computational Methods: From an Initial Hit to Small-Scale Expression of Optimized Binders
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Optimizing Antibody–Antigen Binding Affinities with the ADAPT Platform
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Using Graph-Based Signatures to Guide Rational Antibody Engineering
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 A Computational Framework for Determining the Breadth of Antibodies Against Highly Mutable Pathogens
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Analytical Method for Experimental Validation of Computer-Designed Antibody
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Computational Analysis of Antibody Paratopes for Antibody Sequences in Antibody Libraries
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Bioinformatic Analysis of Natively Paired VH:VL Antibody Repertoires for Antibody Discovery
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Analyzing Antibody Repertoire Using Next-Generation Sequencing and Machine Learning
  28. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 27 A Computational Pipeline for Predicting Cancer Neoepitopes
Attention for Chapter 24: Computational Analysis of Antibody Paratopes for Antibody Sequences in Antibody Libraries
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Computational Analysis of Antibody Paratopes for Antibody Sequences in Antibody Libraries
Chapter number 24
Book title
Computer-Aided Antibody Design
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2609-2_24
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162608-5, 978-1-07-162609-2
Authors

Peng, Hung-Pin, Yang, An-Suei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,498,776
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,972
of 13,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,013,765
of 22,504,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#9,954
of 13,159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,504,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13,159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.