You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Cyber Forensic Taxonomy for SCADA Systems in Critical Infrastructure
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 3 |
| Book title |
Critical Information Infrastructures Security
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-33331-1_3 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-933330-4, 978-3-31-933331-1
|
| Authors |
Peter Eden, Andrew Blyth, Pete Burnap, Yulia Cherdantseva, Kevin Jones, Hugh Soulsby, Kristan Stoddart |
| Editors |
Erich Rome, Marianthi Theocharidou, Stephen Wolthusen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 16 | 67% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#14,703,598
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#3,872
of 8,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,907
of 350,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#117
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.