↓ Skip to main content

Translational Biomedical Informatics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 6: Metagenomics and Single-Cell Omics Data Analysis for Human Microbiome Research.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Metagenomics and Single-Cell Omics Data Analysis for Human Microbiome Research.
Chapter number 6
Book title
Translational Biomedical Informatics
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-1503-8_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-9-81-101502-1, 978-9-81-101503-8
Authors

Maozhen Han, Pengshuo Yang, Hao Zhou, Hongjun Li, Kang Ning

Editors

Bairong Shen, Haixu Tang, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract

Microbes are ubiquitous on our planet, and it is well known that the total number of microbial cells on earth is huge. These organisms usually live in communities, and each of these communities has a different taxonomical structure. As such, microbial communities would serve as the largest reservoir of genes and genetic functions for a vast number of applications in "bio"-related disciplines, especially in biomedicine. Human microbiome is the area in which the relationships between ourselves as hosts and our microbiomes have been examined.In this chapter, we have first reviewed the researches in microbes on community, population and single-cell levels in general. Then we have focused on the effects of recent metagenomics and single-cell advances on human microbiome research, as well as their effects on translational biomedical research. We have also foreseen that with the advancement of big-data analysis techniques, deeper understanding of human microbiome, as well as its broader applications, could be realized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 8%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Computer Science 2 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,486,526
of 22,899,952 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#1,898
of 4,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,412
of 311,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#34
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,899,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.