You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Lattice Paths and Determinants
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Computational Discrete Mathematics
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45506-x_1 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-042775-9, 978-3-54-045506-6
|
| Authors |
Martin Aigner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 67% |
| Professor | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 2 | 67% |
| Engineering | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2009.
All research outputs
#5,846,050
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#1,912
of 8,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,420
of 396,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#199
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.