You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Characterization of Circular RNAs.
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 17 |
Book title |
Long Non-Coding RNAs
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3378-5_17 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3376-1, 978-1-4939-3378-5
|
Authors |
Yang Zhang, Li Yang, Ling-Ling Chen |
Editors |
Yi Feng, Lin Zhang |
Abstract |
Accumulated lines of evidence reveal that a large number of circular RNAs are produced in transcriptomes from fruit fly to mouse and human. Unlike linear RNAs shaped with 5' cap and 3' tail, circular RNAs are characterized by covalently closed loop structures without open terminals, thus requiring specific treatments for their identification and validation. Here, we describe a detailed pipeline for the characterization of circular RNAs. It has been successfully applied to the study of circular intronic RNAs derived from intron lariats (ciRNAs) and circular RNAs produced from back spliced exons (circRNAs) in human. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2016.
All research outputs
#18,478,448
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,926
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,614
of 393,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#845
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.