↓ Skip to main content

Plant Mineral Nutrients

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 8: Multielement Plant Tissue Analysis Using ICP Spectrometry.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Multielement Plant Tissue Analysis Using ICP Spectrometry.
Chapter number 8
Book title
Plant Mineral Nutrients
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-152-3_8
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-151-6, 978-1-62703-152-3
Authors

T. H. Hansen, T. C. de Bang, K. H. Laursen, P. Pedas, S. Husted, J. K. Schjoerring

Editors

Frans J.M. Maathuis

Abstract

Plant tissue analysis is a valuable tool for evaluating the nutritional status and quality of crops and is widely used for scientific and commercial purposes. The majority of plant analyzes are now performed by techniques based on ICP spectrometry such as inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) or ICP-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). These techniques enable fast and accurate measurements of multielement profiles when combined with appropriate methods for sample preparation and digestion. This chapter presents state-of-the-art methods for digestion of plant tissues and subsequent analysis of their multielement composition by ICP spectrometry. Details on upcoming techniques, expected to gain importance within the field of multielement plant tissue analysis over the coming years, are also provided. Finally, attention is given to laser ablation ICP-MS (LA-ICP-MS) for multielement bioimaging of plant tissues. The presentation of the methods covers instructions on all steps from sampling and sample preparation to data interpretation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Cuba 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 4 6%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,169,675
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,828
of 13,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,075
of 172,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#59
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.