↓ Skip to main content

NASA Formal Methods

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 15: Neural Network Compression of ACAS Xu Early Prototype is Unsafe: Closed-Loop Verification through Quantized State Backreachability
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Neural Network Compression of ACAS Xu Early Prototype is Unsafe: Closed-Loop Verification through Quantized State Backreachability
Chapter number 15
Book title
NASA Formal Methods
Published in
arXiv, January 2022
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2201.06626
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-106772-3, 978-3-03-106773-0
Authors

Stanley Bak, Hoang-Dung Tran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#14,292,486
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#168,210
of 915,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,001
of 515,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#4,399
of 26,006 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26,006 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.