Chapter title |
Automatic Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation from 3T Multi-modality Images
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 28 |
Book title |
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, October 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_28 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-947156-3, 978-3-31-947157-0
|
Authors |
Zhengwang Wu, Yaozong Gao, Feng Shi, Valerie Jewells, Dinggang Shen |
Editors |
Li Wang, Ehsan Adeli, Qian Wang, Yinghuan Shi, Heung-Il Suk |
Abstract |
Hippocampal subfields play important and divergent roles in both memory formation and early diagnosis of many neurological diseases, but automatic subfield segmentation is less explored due to its small size and poor image contrast. In this paper, we propose an automatic learning-based hippocampal subfields segmentation framework using multi-modality 3TMR images, including T1 MRI and resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI). To do this, we first acquire both 3T and 7T T1 MRIs for each training subject, and then the 7T T1 MRI are linearly registered onto the 3T T1 MRI. Six hippocampal subfields are manually labeled on the aligned 7T T1 MRI, which has the 7T image contrast but sits in the 3T T1 space. Next, corresponding appearance and relationship features from both 3T T1 MRI and rs-fMRI are extracted to train a structured random forest as a multi-label classifier to conduct the segmentation. Finally, the subfield segmentation is further refined iteratively by additional context features and updated relationship features. To our knowledge, this is the first work that addresses the challenging automatic hippocampal subfields segmentation using 3T routine T1 MRI and rs-fMRI. The quantitative comparison between our results and manual ground truth demonstrates the effectiveness of our method. Besides, we also find that (a) multi-modality features significantly improved subfield segmentation performance due to the complementary information among modalities; (b) automatic segmentation results using 3T multimodality images are partially comparable to those on 7T T1 MRI. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 4 | 40% |
Psychology | 2 | 20% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 10% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |