You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Sixty Years Research with Characean Cells: Fascinating Material for Plant Cell Biology
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 1 |
| Book title |
Progress in Botany 72
|
| Published in |
Progress in botany Fortschritte der Botanik, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-13145-5_1 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-213144-8, 978-3-64-213145-5
|
| Authors |
Masashi Tazawa, Tazawa, Masashi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 100% |
| Researcher | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 100% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,722,978
of 23,485,204 outputs
Outputs from Progress in botany Fortschritte der Botanik
#4
of 16 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,434
of 399,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in botany Fortschritte der Botanik
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,485,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.