↓ Skip to main content

Proteogenomics

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 9: Proteogenomics
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Proteogenomics
Chapter number 9
Book title
Proteogenomics
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42316-6_9
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942314-2, 978-3-31-942316-6
Authors

Kondo, Tadashi, Tadashi Kondo

Editors

Ákos Végvári

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Gain-of-function mutations in KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) drive most GISTs, and 85 % of GISTs also contain oncogenic mutations in one of two receptor tyrosine kinases. The advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has had a significant impact on the clinical practices for GISTs. However, tumors in more than 80 % of GIST patients acquire resistance against treatments with tyrosine kinase inhibitors; thus, driver mechanisms of secondary resistance as well as biomarkers for early detection of recurrence have been explored for better clinical outcomes. Proteomics is a versatile and straightforward approach to finding the molecular basis of malignancies as well as the innovative seeds for clinical applications. Comprehensive genome, epigenome, and transcriptome data have already been obtained and examined together in GISTs, and proteome data has a unique additional value in multi-omics studies. Various types of samples were examined using proteomics modalities in GIST, suggest the promising utility of proteomic approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,385,802
of 22,890,496 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#2,508
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,977
of 322,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#60
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,890,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.