↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 452: The Functional and Structural Neuroanatomy of Systems Consolidation for Autobiographical and Semantic Memory.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Functional and Structural Neuroanatomy of Systems Consolidation for Autobiographical and Semantic Memory.
Chapter number 452
Book title
Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/7854_2016_452
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-978755-8, 978-3-31-978757-2
Authors

Adam J. O. Dede, Christine N. Smith, Dede, Adam J. O., Smith, Christine N.

Abstract

It is well established that patients with memory impairment have more difficulty retrieving memories from the recent past relative to the remote past and that damage to the medial temporal lobe (MTL) plays a key role in this pattern of impairment. The precise role of the MTL and how it may interact with other brain regions remains an area of active research. We investigated the role of structures in a memory network that supports remembering. Our chapter focuses on two types of memory: episodic memory and semantic memory. Findings from studies of patients with brain damage and neuroimaging studies in patients and healthy individuals were considered together to identify the functional and structural neuroanatomy of past remembrance.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 26%
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 32%
Psychology 11 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#404
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#61
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.