↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 456: The Representational Basis of Working Memory.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
The Representational Basis of Working Memory.
Chapter number 456
Book title
Behavioral Neuroscience of Learning and Memory
Published in
Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/7854_2016_456
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-978755-8, 978-3-31-978757-2
Authors

Derek Evan Nee, Mark D’Esposito, Nee, Derek Evan, D’Esposito, Mark

Abstract

Working memory refers to a system involved in the online maintenance and manipulation of information in the absence of external input. Due to the importance of working memory in higher-level cognition, a wealth of neuroscience studies has investigated its neural basis. These studies have often led to conflicting viewpoints regarding the importance of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and posterior sensory cortices. Here, we review evidence for each position. We suggest that the relative contributions of the PFC and sensory cortices to working memory can be understood with respect to processing demands. We argue that procedures that minimize processing demands lead to increased importance of sensory representations, while procedures that permit transformational processing lead to representational abstraction that relies on the PFC. We suggest that abstract PFC representations support top-down control over posterior representations while also providing bottom-up inputs into higher-level cognitive processing. Although a number of contemporary studies have studied working memory while using procedures that minimize the role of the PFC, we argue that consideration of the PFC is critical for our understanding of working memory and higher-level cognition more generally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 24%
Neuroscience 20 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#404
of 499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,141
of 396,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
#61
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.