↓ Skip to main content

Nanotoxicity

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Nanotoxicity'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Historical Overview of Nanotechnology and Nanotoxicology
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Characterization of Nanomaterials for Toxicological Studies
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Methods for Understanding the Interaction Between Nanoparticles and Cells
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet) Assay in Nano-genotoxicology
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Single-Cell Nanotoxicity Assays of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Western Blot Analysis
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Application of Reverse Transcription-PCR and Real-Time PCR in Nanotoxicity Research
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Deriving TC 50 Values of Nanoparticles from Electrochemical Monitoring of Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Indirectly
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay of IL-8 Production in Response to Silver Nanoparticles
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Metabolomics Techniques in Nanotoxicology Studies
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Nanoparticle Uptake Measured by Flow Cytometry
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Determining Biological Activity of Nanoparticles as Measured by Flow Cytometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Whole Cell Impedance Biosensoring Devices
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Free Energy Calculation of Permeant–Membrane Interactions Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Screening of Fullerene Toxicity by Hemolysis Assay
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Assessment of In Vitro Skin Irritation Potential of Nanoparticles: RHE Model
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 In Vivo Methods of Nanotoxicology
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 The Luminescent Bacteria Test to Determine the Acute Toxicity of Nanoparticle Suspensions
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 The Primacy of Physicochemical Characterization of Nanomaterials for Reliable Toxicity Assessment: A Review of the Zebrafish Nanotoxicology Model
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Application of Embryonic and Adult Zebrafish for Nanotoxicity Assessment
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Applications of Subsurface Microscopy
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Application of ICP-MS for the Study of Disposition and Toxicity of Metal-Based Nanomaterials
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Quantitative Nanoparticle Organ Disposition by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Nanoparticle Toxicity Study
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Biophysical Methods for Assessing Plant Responses to Nanoparticle Exposure
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 In Vivo Nanotoxicity Assays in Plant Models
Attention for Chapter 6: Western Blot Analysis
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Western Blot Analysis
Chapter number 6
Book title
Nanotoxicity
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-002-1_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-001-4, 978-1-62703-002-1
Authors

Seishiro Hirano, Hirano, Seishiro

Abstract

Electrophoresis and the following western blot analysis are indispensable to investigate biochemical changes in cells and tissues exposed to nanoparticles or nanomaterials. Proteins should be extracted from the cells and tissues using a proper method, especially when phosphorylated proteins are to be detected. It is important to select a good blocking agent and an appropriate pair of primary and peroxidase-tagged secondary antibodies to obtain good results in western blot analysis. One thing that may be specific to nanomaterials, and that you should keep in mind, is that some proteins may be adsorbed on the surface of particulate nanomaterials. In this chapter the whole process of western blot analysis, from sample preparation to quantitative measurement of target proteins, is described.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 213 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 17%
Student > Master 24 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 63 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Chemistry 6 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 65 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2013.
All research outputs
#20,182,546
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,829
of 13,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,234
of 244,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#424
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.