Insoluble Proteins
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Cleavable Self-Aggregating Tags (cSAT) for Therapeutic Peptide Expression and Purification
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Insoluble Proteins
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-1859-2_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-161858-5, 978-1-07-161859-2
|
| Authors |
Yang, Xiaofeng, Lin, Zhanglin, Jing, Yanyun |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,320,890
of 24,892,887 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,571
of 13,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,827
of 514,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#112
of 813 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,892,887 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 813 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.