↓ Skip to main content

Autophagy and Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: A Method to Identify Potential Prognostic Markers Across Distinct Tumor Types
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
A Method to Identify Potential Prognostic Markers Across Distinct Tumor Types
Book title
Methods in Molecular Biology
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2022
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-2071-7_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-162070-0, 978-1-07-162071-7
Authors

Zhang, Boxi, Kochetkova, Elena, Norberg, Erik

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#20,262,276
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,898
of 13,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#408,306
of 498,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#403
of 594 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,110 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 594 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.