↓ Skip to main content

Non-coding RNAs in Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 3: MicroRNAs and Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
MicroRNAs and Inflammation in Colorectal Cancer.
Chapter number 3
Book title
Non-coding RNAs in Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-42059-2_3
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-942057-8, 978-3-31-942059-2
Authors

Claire Josse, Vincent Bours, Josse, Claire, Bours, Vincent

Editors

Ondrej Slaby, George A. Calin

Abstract

Colorectal cancers (CRC) are known to be related to inflammatory conditions, and inflammatory bowel diseases increase the relative risk for developing CRC. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs prevents the development of colorectal cancer.Several molecular mediators are connecting the pathways that are involved in inflammatory conditions and in carcinogenesis. By the way these pathways are tightly interwoven, with the consequence that a deregulation at the level of any of these molecular mediators can affect the others.MiRNAs are demonstrated to be deregulated in inflammatory bowel diseases and in colorectal cancer. Moreover, they target several molecular mediators that connect inflammation to cancer, and they are thus implicated in the route from inflammation to colorectal cancer.This chapter will focus on the miRNAs that are jointly deregulated in inflammatory bowel disease and in colorectal cancer. Their role on the regulation of the molecular mediators and pathways that link inflammation to cancer will be described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Master 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,341,859
of 22,888,307 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,972
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,970
of 336,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#62
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,888,307 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.