You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 12 |
| Book title |
Heterologous Expression of Membrane Proteins
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-3637-3_12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3635-9, 978-1-4939-3637-3
|
| Authors |
Kalathur, Ravi C, Panganiban, Marinela, Bruni, Renato, Ravi C. Kalathur, Marinela Panganiban, Renato Bruni |
| Editors |
Isabelle Mus-Veteau |
| Abstract |
The ease of use, robustness, cost-effectiveness, and posttranslational machinery make baculovirus expression system a popular choice for production of eukaryotic membrane proteins. This system can be readily adapted for high-throughput operations. This chapter outlines the techniques and procedures for cloning, transfection, small-scale production, and purification of membrane protein samples in a high-throughput manner. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 50% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Psychology | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#12,963,262
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#3,295
of 13,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,434
of 393,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#310
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.