↓ Skip to main content

The Kappa Opioid Receptor

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter: Considerations on Using Antibodies for Studying the Dynorphins/Kappa Opioid Receptor System.
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Considerations on Using Antibodies for Studying the Dynorphins/Kappa Opioid Receptor System.
Book title
The Kappa Opioid Receptor
Published in
Handbook of experimental pharmacology, June 2021
DOI 10.1007/164_2021_467
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-03-089073-5, 978-3-03-089074-2
Authors

Chen, Chongguang, Widmann, Melanie, Schwarzer, Christoph, Liu-Chen, Lee-Yuan, Chongguang Chen, Melanie Widmann, Christoph Schwarzer, Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen

Abstract

Antibodies are important tools for protein and peptide research, including for the kappa opioid receptor (KOR) and dynorphins (Dyns). Well-characterized antibodies are essential for rigorous and reproducible research. However, lack of validation of antibody specificity has been thought to contribute significantly to the reproducibility crisis in biomedical research. Since 2003, many scientific journals have required documentation of validation of antibody specificity and use of knockout mouse tissues as a negative control is strongly recommended. Lack of specificity of antibodies against many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) after extensive testing has been well-documented, but antibodies generated against partial sequences of the KOR have not been similarly investigated. For the dynorphins, differential processing has been described in distinct brain areas, resulting in controversial findings in immunohistochemistry (IHC) when different antibodies were used. In this chapter, we summarized accepted approaches for validation of antibody specificity. We discussed two KOR antibodies most commonly used in IHC and described generation and characterization of KOR antibodies and phospho-KOR specific antibodies in western blotting or immunoblotting (IB). In addition, applying antibodies targeting prodynorphin or mature dynorphin A illustrates the diversity of results obtained regarding the distribution of dynorphins in distinct brain areas.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#19,414,819
of 23,884,161 outputs
Outputs from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#525
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,020
of 434,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Handbook of experimental pharmacology
#17
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.