@aidangcw I used to intern at the Leuven university group working on emotion dymamics and methodology. I think they did some work that could be interesting. I'll link a book chapter here https://t.co/4SUj99ulYi
All else being equal, when emotional inertia/autoregression increases, the net variability increases. Thus, it is some unintuitive combination of emotional sensitivity/reactivity (innovation variance) and resistance to change (autoregression). 7/10 https:/
The so-called net-variability index (i.e., standard deviation/variance), typically used as an index of emotional variability, can be written as a function of the first-order autoregressive effect (aka emotional inertia) and the innovation variance 3/10 htt
What a thoughtful thread! Yes, we need better methods in EMA (not only frequency, but also how we measure and we need to take measurement reactivity seriously!). The fallacy of EMA is that we still don't measure the movie. We measure "pictures of movies" (