↓ Skip to main content

Biomedical Engineering Technologies

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 29: Hyperpolarized Micro-NMR Platform for Sensitive Analysis of In Vitro Metabolic Flux in Living Cells
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Hyperpolarized Micro-NMR Platform for Sensitive Analysis of In Vitro Metabolic Flux in Living Cells
Chapter number 29
Book title
Biomedical Engineering Technologies
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, November 2021
DOI 10.1007/978-1-0716-1803-5_29
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-07-161802-8, 978-1-07-161803-5
Authors

Jeong, Sangmoo, Keshari, Kayvan R.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2024.
All research outputs
#21,169,343
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#9,248
of 14,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#396,996
of 525,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#539
of 910 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,503 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 910 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.