You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Assessing disturbance from under-ice noise on fishes in boreal lakes.
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 82 |
| Book title |
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life
|
| Published in |
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4419-7311-5_82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4419-7310-8, 978-1-4419-7311-5
|
| Authors |
Peter A. Cott, David A. Mann, Dennis M. Higgs, Tom A. Johnston, John M. Gunn, Cott, Peter A., Mann, David A., Higgs, Dennis M., Johnston, Tom A., Gunn, John M., Peter A. Cott, David A. Mann, Dennis M. Higgs, Tom A. Johnston, John M. Gunn |
| Editors |
Arthur N. Popper, Anthony Hawkins |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 42% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 5 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,823,812
of 23,327,904 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#3,369
of 4,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,675
of 246,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#96
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,327,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,754 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.