Unsupervised classification of cell imaging data using the quantization error in a Self Organizing…
Springer International Publishing
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unsupervised classification of cell imaging data using the quantization error in a Self Organizing Map
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
arXiv, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-030-70296-0 |
| ISBNs |
978-3-03-070295-3, 978-3-03-070296-0
|
| Authors |
Birgitta Dresp-Langley, JM Wandeto |
| Editors |
Hamid R. Arabnia, Ken Ferens, David de la Fuente, Elena B. Kozerenko, José Angel Olivas Varela, Fernando G. Tinetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 17% |
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,604,885
of 24,631,014 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#153,925
of 996,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,902
of 437,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#5,509
of 33,743 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,631,014 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 996,037 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33,743 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.