You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gold-ionic liquid nanofluids with preferably tribological properties and thermal conductivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Discover Nano, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1556-276x-6-259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baogang Wang, Xiaobo Wang, Wenjing Lou, Jingcheng Hao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 34% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Discover Nano
#227
of 1,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,705
of 120,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Discover Nano
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.