You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clostridium difficile
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6361-4 |
| ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6359-1, 978-1-4939-6361-4
|
| Editors |
Adam P. Roberts, Peter Mullany |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 66% |
| Scientists | 10 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,069,453
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#103
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,887
of 396,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#18
of 1,472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.