↓ Skip to main content

The Reduction of Chronic, Nonspecific Low Back Pain Through the Control of Early Morning Lumbar Flexion: 3-Year Follow-Up

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Reduction of Chronic, Nonspecific Low Back Pain Through the Control of Early Morning Lumbar Flexion: 3-Year Follow-Up
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, March 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1013542119063
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stover H. Snook, Barbara S. Webster, Raymond W. McGorry

Abstract

Three years ago, an 18-month randomized controlled trial of chronic, nonspecific low back pain investigated the effectiveness of instructing subjects to restrict bending activities in the early morning, when the fluid content in the disc is increased. Pain days (as recorded by daily diaries) were reduced 23% in the treatment group, compared to a 2% reduction in the control (sham treatment) group. The purpose of the current follow-up study was to determine whether the results of that trial were maintained during the 3 years following completion of the trial. A questionnaire was mailed to the 60 subjects who completed the original trial. Fifty subjects completed the questionnaire for a response rate of 83%. Thirty-one subjects (62%) continued to restrict bending activities in the early morning, and experienced a further reduction of 10.1 pain days per month (51%) since the completion of the experiment. However, some of the subjects who did not continue to comply also improved. Several possible explanations for the improvement of noncompliant subjects are offered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Other 8 9%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Sports and Recreations 7 8%
Psychology 4 5%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,373,276
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#218
of 665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,672
of 49,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them